Not With a Bang but a “Wimps” Lunch

This is the way the world ends, or at least I hope so. Wimps lunches are so called because they are for people who only like one bottle each for lunch (although they actually allow for ten bottles between each table of eight). They take place every month at La Trompette and are organised through the wine forum. This month was the turn of Austria/Germany.

As usual, the event is as much about the food and company as it is about the wine, but we didn’t do badly on that front. We actually managed twelve wines, one being a replacement for the TCA affected 1976 Grünhauser in the list below.

1. 2007 Wittmann Westhofener Morstein Riesling GG, Rheinhessen

2. 2005 JJ Prüm Wehlener Sonnenuhr Auslese, Mosel

3. 2001 JJ Prüm Wehlener Sonnenuhr Auslese, Mosel

4. 1994 JJ Prüm Wehlener Sonnenuhr Auslese, Mosel

5. 1989 Von Schubert Maximin Grünhauser Abtsberg Spätlese, Mosel

6. 1976 Von Schubert Maximin Grünhauser Abtsberg Auslese 46

7. 1913 Walter Siegel Forster Kirchenstück Auslese, Pfalz

8. 1989 Von Schubert Maximin Grünhauser Abtsberg Auslese 133

9. 1996 Von Schubert Maximin Grünhauser Abtsberg Auslese 55

10. 2008 Muhr-Van der Niepoort Spitzerberg Blaufränkisch, Carnuntum

11. 2003 Ruster Eiswein Weingutshof Landauer, Burgenland

12. 2002 Kracher Welschriesling TBA #8 Zwischen den Seen, Burgenland


Most of the wines shone to some degree. Other than the corked (if not irredeemably) 1976 (wine 6 above), the red Niepoort was quite disappointing. It was lovely six months ago yet this bottle tasted a bit dilute and lighter. The only other red on the day (on another table) tasted much better – an unusually big, especially for its age, 2004 Zweigelt from Johann Schwarz with some input from Manfred Krankel.


For me, the wine of the day was the first to pass my lips, the Wittmann Morstein. Refined in the extreme, it started quite rich but the minerally tone took over. Claude Kolm attributed the very special terroir characteristics to the limestone soils of the Wonnegau. As others have said, it’s one of the most exciting areas in Germany right now and this beautiful wine shows why. I wish I had a few bottles.

image image

The Prüm Auslesen were fascinating to compare. The 2005 seemed quite a bit too young for me, but at the other end of the age scale the 1994 was classy. The only problem here was the food pairing, the scallop starter (with bonito cream, pickled cucumber and wasabi). It had, ironically, been perfectly matched with the Riverby GV last week, but the wines today overpowered it, and the acidity of the dish grated. Lovely dish, lovely wines, but no meeting of souls.


The next five wines ended up as a quartet of Von Schuberts surrounding a museum piece 1913 from the Pfalz. Aside from the corked 1976, these were marvellous wines, with the Grünhausers an embarrassment of riches, each with something distinct to offer.


The Kirchenstück was in many ways a miracle, deserving of a paragraph of its own. That it was drinkable would have been enough but it was more than that. It’s sugars, which had undoubtedly sustained it on it’s journey were now, by-and-large, all gone in terms of sweetness. Madeira brown in colour, the nose was complex, both powerful and haunting at once (though a couple of people broke the spell exclaiming “cornflakes”). The slightly caramel-honey palate lingered and lingered. It’s not often I get to try a really old German wine, but it was a privilege. To think, the kind person who brought this is also absailing for charity at the Olympic Park on Monday. What a guy!


I mentioned the Blaufränkisch as the only disappointment of the day. A shame as it was our solitary red and it was paired with the dish of the day, veal rack with späetzle, sweetcorn and ceps, with fine aromas and flavours compensating for the wine. Yet it’s a red that has won praise from critics, so a duff bottle…maybe.


With a dessert of crème fraiche tarte with passionfruit the two dessert wines provided a real contrast. The western side of the lake gave us a fresh Ruster Eiswein, with a lightness contrasting its sweet richness, and good acidity. The Kracher, from the eastern side of the Neusiedler See, was typical of this wine/grape at this sort of age. The acidity has diminished but not the sweetness and you are left with a sweet honey richness. Although La Trompette’s wine team thought it the best of the Krachers on show, I actually loved a taste of a Kracher Chardonnay on another table, younger and fresher.


As usual, a wonderfully congenial time was had by all who made it yesterday. If indeed the world were to end after such a wonderful array of these wines, I’d be pushed to complain.


About dccrossley

Writing here and elsewhere mainly about the outer reaches of the wine universe and the availability of wonderful, characterful, wines from all over the globe. Very wide interests but a soft spot for Jura, Austria and Champagne, with a general preference for low intervention in vineyard and winery. Other passions include music (equally wide tastes) and travel. Co-organiser of the Oddities wine lunches.
This entry was posted in Austrian Wine, Dining, Fine Wine, German Wine, Wine, Wine Tastings and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Not With a Bang but a “Wimps” Lunch

  1. amarch34 says:

    David, you lucky man, to have such a range is extraordinary. To get to drink a wine from the eve of WW1 which is still alive, well wow! What vintage was the Morstein. I must read up more on the new, up and coming German vineyards. Thanks for sharing.


  2. dccrossley says:

    Alan, well spotted, I must amend that. It was 2007, a super vintage. I like dry Riesling but I think the Wittmann would convert anyone.


  3. Ian Black says:

    There’s a lot of interest in that collection of wines, David. Pity so many timings clash or it would have been another one I would have attended.

    And a pity about the red. I know the wine and it should have been right up the street of those present. As you say, maybe just a bad bottle – it happens.

    That scallop dish – I’ve had one very much like it at the Ledbury, with an older Auslese (still pungent but having lost a lot of it’s more overt sweetness). It worked really well. If pushed to explain it, I might guess that it was something to do with it needing a more mature wine than the pungency of a mid-life riesling.

    Of course, one can seem picky when the rest of the event was clearly so good, and I wouldn’t want any casual internaut reading this to think that these events are anything less than excellent. Good to read another account of this one!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.